GuruG
← All ballot proposals
Michigan · November 3, 2026 · Proposal 2026-1

Should Michigan hold a constitutional convention?

Decide whether elected delegates should meet in 2027 to propose a revision of Michigan’s state constitution.

Reviewed September 28, 2026

You are voting on starting a process.

A Yes vote does not itself adopt a new constitution. Any proposed revision would return to voters for approval or rejection.

Official ballot wording · page 1 (PDF)

How this reached the ballot

Michigan’s constitution requires the question

Article XII, Section 3 requires the constitutional-convention question to return to voters every 16 years. The 2026 question follows that schedule; no new signature campaign was needed to put this recurring question on the ballot. Organizations supporting or opposing it are not its originators.

Origin sources

Origin checked October 7, 2026.

What your vote means

If the proposal passes

Yes: call a convention

Authorize elected delegates to draft a general revision in 2027. Voters would have another decision on the resulting proposal.

Check the official wording
If the proposal fails

No: do not call this convention

Michigan continues under its existing constitution and amendment process, including individual constitutional amendments approved by voters. The convention question is scheduled to return automatically in 2042.

Check the research summary · page 1

Key decision facts

Who pays?
Taxpayers would fund delegate elections and the convention through public spending.
Cost to property owners
No property-tax rate is authorized by this question. A total convention cost has not been verified.
For how long?
Delegates would convene in 2027. The constitution sets no drafting deadline.
What happens next?
Any proposed constitutional revision requires a separate vote of the people.
Canton Precinct 8 sample ballot · PDF page 3Citizens Research Council · convention process and costs

What happens next?

  1. Voters decide whether to call a convention.
  2. If approved, voters elect delegates. The delegates meet and draft proposed changes.
  3. Voters decide on the result. The convention’s proposal requires a separate approval vote.

Citizens Research Council: process explanation · pages 1–2

Read the question on your sample ballot
Shall a convention of elected delegates be convened in 2027 to draft a general revision of the State Constitution for presentation to the state’s voters for their approval or rejection?

Canton Precinct 8 sample ballot · PDF page 3 · State-issued wording · dated July 24, 2026

Why is this on the ballot?

The current constitution requires this question every 16 years. A No vote does not prevent individual constitutional amendments through the existing amendment process.

Citizens Research Council: constitutional revision and amendment background

Consider the tradeoffs

The decision depends on how you weigh the opportunity for broad reform against the uncertainty of opening the constitution to revision.

Potential benefit: review the constitution as a whole

A convention could revisit government structure and outdated provisions together. The Citizens Research Council identifies possible reforms while taking no position on whether to call a convention.

Research analysis · pages 2–4

This is a potential benefit identified in analysis, not a promise of what delegates would do or an endorsement by the Research Council. A current Yes campaign statement has not been verified for this draft.

Opponent argument: uncertainty and disruption

The Detroit Regional Chamber opposes the proposal. It argues that a lengthy and unpredictable revision process could undermine business investment and stability.

Chamber’s position · May 15, 2026

This is an advocacy argument about possible consequences, not an established outcome. Proposed constitutional changes would still require voter approval.

What is still unknown?

Who would be elected as delegates, what they would propose, how long drafting would take, and the final cost are not established here. The research summary notes that the constitution sets no drafting deadline and that taxpayers would fund the convention and delegate elections.

Research summary · page 2

We have not verified a cost estimate or completed a survey of supporting and opposing organizations.

Keep the decision separate from predictions.

The ballot authorizes a convention. It does not specify the changes delegates would draft. Neither benefits nor harms described by advocates are guaranteed.

Explore all five proposals →

Source types: official ballot wording, independent research, and a clearly attributed advocacy statement. GuruG does not recommend Yes or No.

How we research

Local club endorsements

Published club choices, not GuruG recommendations or professional ratings. “Not listed” does not mean opposed.

Canton Democratic Club: No

Plymouth Canton Republicans Club: No

Club sources reviewed October 6, 2026; follow the linked source pages for updates.