Yes: call a convention
Authorize elected delegates to draft a general revision in 2027. Voters would have another decision on the resulting proposal.
Check the official wordingDecide whether elected delegates should meet in 2027 to propose a revision of Michigan’s state constitution.
Reviewed September 28, 2026
A Yes vote does not itself adopt a new constitution. Any proposed revision would return to voters for approval or rejection.
Article XII, Section 3 requires the constitutional-convention question to return to voters every 16 years. The 2026 question follows that schedule; no new signature campaign was needed to put this recurring question on the ballot. Organizations supporting or opposing it are not its originators.
Origin checked October 7, 2026.
Authorize elected delegates to draft a general revision in 2027. Voters would have another decision on the resulting proposal.
Check the official wordingMichigan continues under its existing constitution and amendment process, including individual constitutional amendments approved by voters. The convention question is scheduled to return automatically in 2042.
Check the research summary · page 1Citizens Research Council: process explanation · pages 1–2
Shall a convention of elected delegates be convened in 2027 to draft a general revision of the State Constitution for presentation to the state’s voters for their approval or rejection?
Canton Precinct 8 sample ballot · PDF page 3 · State-issued wording · dated July 24, 2026
The current constitution requires this question every 16 years. A No vote does not prevent individual constitutional amendments through the existing amendment process.
Citizens Research Council: constitutional revision and amendment background
The decision depends on how you weigh the opportunity for broad reform against the uncertainty of opening the constitution to revision.
A convention could revisit government structure and outdated provisions together. The Citizens Research Council identifies possible reforms while taking no position on whether to call a convention.
This is a potential benefit identified in analysis, not a promise of what delegates would do or an endorsement by the Research Council. A current Yes campaign statement has not been verified for this draft.
The Detroit Regional Chamber opposes the proposal. It argues that a lengthy and unpredictable revision process could undermine business investment and stability.
Chamber’s position · May 15, 2026
This is an advocacy argument about possible consequences, not an established outcome. Proposed constitutional changes would still require voter approval.
Who would be elected as delegates, what they would propose, how long drafting would take, and the final cost are not established here. The research summary notes that the constitution sets no drafting deadline and that taxpayers would fund the convention and delegate elections.
We have not verified a cost estimate or completed a survey of supporting and opposing organizations.
The ballot authorizes a convention. It does not specify the changes delegates would draft. Neither benefits nor harms described by advocates are guaranteed.
Source types: official ballot wording, independent research, and a clearly attributed advocacy statement. GuruG does not recommend Yes or No.
How we researchPublished club choices, not GuruG recommendations or professional ratings. “Not listed” does not mean opposed.
Plymouth Canton Republicans Club: No
Club sources reviewed October 6, 2026; follow the linked source pages for updates.